PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMNI vs. OXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RMNI vs. OXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMNI achieves a 21.65% return, which is significantly higher than OXLC's -5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RMNI has underperformed OXLC with an annualized return of -6.95%, while OXLC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.81% annualized return.


RMNI

1D
-1.26%
1M
13.46%
6M
21.03%
YTD
21.65%
1Y
-9.92%
3Y*
-1.31%
5Y*
-9.21%
10Y*
-6.95%

OXLC

1D
0.66%
1M
31.52%
6M
-5.42%
YTD
-5.09%
1Y
-21.14%
3Y*
-0.84%
5Y*
-2.79%
10Y*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMNI vs. OXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMNI
Rimini Street, Inc.
21.65%45.32%-18.35%-14.17%-36.18%34.76%14.18%-24.66%-34.89%-20.18%
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
-5.09%-24.38%24.58%16.52%-24.15%59.91%-15.79%-0.98%12.86%13.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RMNI and OXLC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2015

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMNI:

$436.88M

OXLC:

$891.09M

EPS

RMNI:

$0.37

OXLC:

-$5.82

PS Ratio

RMNI:

1.06

OXLC:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMNI:

$422.81M

OXLC:

$849.13M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMNI:

$253.33M

OXLC:

$793.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

RMNI:

$62.77M

OXLC:

-$578.64M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMNI vs. OXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMNI
RMNI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RMNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMNI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RMNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMNI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

OXLC
OXLC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
OXLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OXLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
OXLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
OXLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
OXLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMNI vs. OXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMNIOXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.93

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

-0.43

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

-0.78

+0.45

RMNI vs. OXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMNI Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the OXLC Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMNI and OXLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMNI vs. OXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMNI drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, which is greater than OXLC's maximum drawdown of -74.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMNI and OXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMNIOXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.93%

-74.58%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.32%

-50.80%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.89%

-57.17%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.93%

-57.17%

-28.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.93%

-74.58%

-11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.23%

-32.02%

-26.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.29%

-14.12%

-29.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.70%

28.00%

-2.30%

Volatility

RMNI vs. OXLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rimini Street, Inc. (RMNI) is 11.09%, while Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) has a volatility of 25.15%. This indicates that RMNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OXLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMNIOXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.09%

25.15%

-14.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.81%

37.05%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.09%

44.30%

+14.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.30%

28.76%

+36.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.12%

43.29%

+16.83%

Dividends

RMNI vs. OXLC - Dividend Comparison

RMNI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
69.81%35.86%20.12%18.83%17.75%10.51%22.46%19.85%16.70%17.91%22.84%24.10%
RMNI
Rimini Street, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RMNI vs. OXLC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rimini Street, Inc. and Oxford Lane Capital Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
105.47M
166.25M
(RMNI) Total Revenue
(OXLC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RMNI and OXLC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OXLC has higher volatility (25.15%) compared to RMNI (11.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMNI dropped -85.93% vs OXLC's -74.58%.

RMNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMNI and OXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer