PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMME vs. GMMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMME vs. GMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMME achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than GMMF's 2.04% return.


RMME

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.66%
YTD
1.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GMMF

1D
0.03%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.76%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.15M$2.16M$3.30M
$54.96K$79.71K$348.42K

RMME vs. GMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RMME and GMMF is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMME vs. GMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GMMF
GMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMME vs. GMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Government Money Market ETF (RMME) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMMEGMMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

40.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

252.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,218.66

RMME vs. GMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMME vs. GMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMME drawdown since its inception was -0.17%, which is greater than GMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMME and GMMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMMEGMMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.17%

-0.03%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

RMME vs. GMMF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMMEGMMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40%

0.20%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.40%

0.24%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.40%

0.24%

+0.16%

RMME vs. GMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMME has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GMMF's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMME vs. GMMF - Dividend Comparison

RMME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than GMMF's 3.86% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RMME and GMMF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RMME.

GMMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.89% for RMME.

They also come from different issuers: Rareview and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RMME and 0.20% for GMMF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMME and GMMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer