PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMMF vs. LSAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMMF vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMMF vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMMF achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than LSAT's 1.40% return.


GMMF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LSAT

1D
1.77%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
1.40%
6M
-2.97%
1Y
0.13%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMMF vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GMMF vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMMF
GMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAT
LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMMF vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMMFLSATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

16.80

0.01

+16.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

71.56

0.13

+71.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

18.31

1.02

+17.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

132.15

0.07

+132.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1,102.85

0.21

+1,102.63

GMMF vs. LSAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMMF Sharpe Ratio is 16.80, which is higher than the LSAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMMF and LSAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMMFLSATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80

0.01

+16.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

16.12

0.65

+15.47

Correlation

The correlation between GMMF and LSAT is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

GMMF vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison

GMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than LSAT's 1.87% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
GMMF
iShares Government Money Market ETF
3.73%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.87%1.90%1.31%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.30%

Drawdowns

GMMF vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum LSAT drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMMF and LSAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMMFLSATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-20.48%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-13.54%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.77%

+6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.68%

+5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

4.22%

-4.22%

Volatility

GMMF vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) is 0.05%, while Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that GMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMMFLSATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

4.05%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

9.35%

-9.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24%

17.26%

-17.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.25%

16.28%

-16.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.25%

16.90%

-16.65%