PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMEAX vs. GQRPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMEAX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly higher than GQRPX's 3.69% return.


RMEAX

1D
0.82%
1M
0.87%
YTD
6.39%
6M
6.66%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
8.38%

GQRPX

1D
-0.94%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
3.69%
6M
4.39%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RMEAX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund
6.39%17.69%6.55%16.31%-13.67%14.78%3.98%8.44%
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
3.69%0.67%19.98%19.56%-3.77%16.94%14.55%12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RMEAX and GQRPX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between RMEAX and GQRPX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMEAX vs. GQRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMEAX
RMEAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RMEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RMEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRPX
GQRPX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GQRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMEAXGQRPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.09

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.67

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

1.68

+8.12

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the GQRPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMEAX and GQRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMEAX drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum GQRPX drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMEAX and GQRPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMEAXGQRPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-28.88%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-7.02%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-16.49%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.79%

-20.39%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-7.02%

+6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-4.96%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.78%

-0.88%

Volatility

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Volatility Comparison

Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) at 3.08%. This indicates that RMEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMEAXGQRPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.08%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

7.23%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.07%

9.35%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.06%

14.73%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.87%

17.24%

-5.37%

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMEAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than GQRPX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMEAX vs. GQRPX - Dividend Comparison

RMEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, more than GQRPX's 7.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
7.33%7.60%6.35%1.22%2.93%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMEAX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund
11.09%11.80%0.00%5.30%2.16%2.46%1.64%4.69%4.53%2.67%2.27%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMEAX and GQRPX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMEAX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to GQRPX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMEAX dropped -23.70% vs GQRPX's -28.88%.

RMEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMEAX and GQRPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer