RMEAX vs. FMIEX
RMEAX (Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund) and FMIEX (Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RMEAX returned 8.38%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for FMIEX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMEAX charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for FMIEX.
Performance
RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMEAX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than FMIEX's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RMEAX has underperformed FMIEX with an annualized return of 8.38%, while FMIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.
RMEAX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
FMIEX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 26.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMEAX Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund | 6.39% | 17.69% | 6.55% | 16.31% | -13.67% | 14.78% | 3.98% | 16.82% | -3.75% | 21.78% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 11.18% | 30.93% | 8.66% | 5.67% | -0.12% | 25.11% | 2.04% | 17.27% | -5.67% | 11.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMEAX and FMIEX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.76 |
The correlation between RMEAX and FMIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMEAX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank
RMEAX
FMIEX
RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMEAX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.76 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | 14.83 | -5.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMEAX drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMEAX and FMIEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMEAX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -49.85% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -7.04% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | -9.52% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.79% | -18.63% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.70% | -39.33% | +15.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -3.00% | +2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -6.57% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.78% | +0.12% |
Volatility
RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 2.98%. This indicates that RMEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMEAX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 2.98% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 7.51% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 9.56% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 12.71% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.87% | 15.73% | -3.86% |
RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMEAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison
RMEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, more than FMIEX's 5.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 5.14% | 5.76% | 9.02% | 3.27% | 8.54% | 4.34% | 1.74% | 3.82% | 18.46% | 16.45% | 5.16% | 11.75% |
RMEAX Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund | 11.09% | 11.80% | 0.00% | 5.30% | 2.16% | 2.46% | 1.64% | 4.69% | 4.53% | 2.67% | 2.27% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMEAX and FMIEX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMEAX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to FMIEX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMEAX dropped -23.70% vs FMIEX's -49.85%.
FMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMEAX and FMIEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer