PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMEAX vs. FMIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMEAX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than FMIEX's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RMEAX has underperformed FMIEX with an annualized return of 8.38%, while FMIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.


RMEAX

1D
0.82%
1M
0.87%
YTD
6.39%
6M
6.66%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
8.38%

FMIEX

1D
-0.65%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
11.18%
6M
11.79%
1Y
26.32%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMEAX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund
6.39%17.69%6.55%16.31%-13.67%14.78%3.98%16.82%-3.75%21.78%
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
11.18%30.93%8.66%5.67%-0.12%25.11%2.04%17.27%-5.67%11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RMEAX and FMIEX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.76

The correlation between RMEAX and FMIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMEAX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMEAX
RMEAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RMEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RMEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FMIEX
FMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMEAXFMIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.76

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

14.83

-5.03

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the FMIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMEAX and FMIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMEAX drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMEAX and FMIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMEAXFMIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-49.85%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-7.04%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-9.52%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.79%

-18.63%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.70%

-39.33%

+15.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-3.00%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-6.57%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.78%

+0.12%

Volatility

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison

Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 2.98%. This indicates that RMEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMEAXFMIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.98%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

7.51%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.07%

9.56%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.06%

12.71%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.87%

15.73%

-3.86%

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMEAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMEAX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison

RMEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, more than FMIEX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIEX
Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares
5.14%5.76%9.02%3.27%8.54%4.34%1.74%3.82%18.46%16.45%5.16%11.75%
RMEAX
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund
11.09%11.80%0.00%5.30%2.16%2.46%1.64%4.69%4.53%2.67%2.27%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMEAX and FMIEX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMEAX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to FMIEX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMEAX dropped -23.70% vs FMIEX's -49.85%.

FMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMEAX and FMIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer