RMEAX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
RMEAX is managed by Aspiriant. It was launched on Apr 3, 2013. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
RMEAX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMEAX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMEAX Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund | -3.38% | 17.69% | 6.55% | 16.31% | -13.67% | 14.78% | 3.98% | 16.82% | -3.75% | 21.78% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMEAX achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RMEAX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 7.46%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
RMEAX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMEAX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMEAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMEAX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
RMEAX
FGIAX
RMEAX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.79 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 2.30 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.73 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 12.62 | -6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.79 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.80 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.42 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMEAX and FGIAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMEAX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
RMEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.22%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMEAX Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund | 12.22% | 11.80% | 0.00% | 5.30% | 2.16% | 2.46% | 1.64% | 4.69% | 4.53% | 2.67% | 2.27% | 1.79% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
RMEAX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMEAX drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMEAX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.70% | -49.35% | +25.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -8.29% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.79% | -21.08% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.70% | -38.02% | +14.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -3.06% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -7.22% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.79% | +0.37% |
Volatility
RMEAX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Aspiriant Risk-Managed Equity Allocation Fund (RMEAX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that RMEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 4.15% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 7.07% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 12.28% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.96% | 13.08% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 15.17% | -3.36% |