RMBS vs. CD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RMBS (Rambus Inc.) and CD (Chaince Digital Holdings Inc) are both stocks. RMBS operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while CD operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RMBS returned 28.27%/yr vs -25.35%/yr for CD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RMBS vs. CD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 59.50% return, which is significantly higher than CD's -4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has outperformed CD with an annualized return of 28.27%, while CD has yielded a comparatively lower -25.35% annualized return.

RMBS

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 8.68%
• YTD: 59.50%
• 6M: 55.53%
• 1Y: 141.61%
• 3Y*: 32.27%
• 5Y*: 49.08%
• 10Y*: 28.27%

CD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -23.01%
• YTD: -4.43%
• 6M: -33.94%
• 1Y: 15.85%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: -7.87%
• 10Y*: -25.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBS vs. CD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RMBS Rambus Inc.	59.50%	73.84%	-22.55%	90.54%	21.88%	68.33%	26.75%	79.60%	-46.06%	3.27%
CD Chaince Digital Holdings Inc	-4.43%	-27.23%	162.69%	109.41%	-64.75%	3.93%	85.98%	17.14%	-93.14%	-72.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBS and CD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2015	0.12

Fundamentals

EPS RMBS : $2.11 CD : -$0.23
PS Ratio RMBS : 22.20 CD : 180.39
Total Revenue (TTM) RMBS : $721.16M CD : $1.67M
Gross Profit (TTM) RMBS : $555.52M CD : -$1.10M
EBITDA (TTM) RMBS : $298.07M CD : -$10.65M

Return for Risk

RMBS vs. CD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBS

RMBS Risk / Return Rank: 86
RMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CD

CD Risk / Return Rank: 55
CD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CD Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CD Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBS vs. CD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMBS	CD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	0.09	+1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	1.61	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.21	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	0.18	+3.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.73	0.24	+9.49

RMBS vs. CD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the CD Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBS and CD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RMBS vs. CD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CD drawdown of -99.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and CD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMBS	CD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.16%	-99.79%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.69%	-89.83%	+53.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.83%	-89.83%	+41.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.83%	-92.40%	+43.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.95%	-99.58%	+46.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.12%	-98.22%	+84.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.88%	-90.00%	+15.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.62%	67.26%	-52.64%

Volatility

RMBS vs. CD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) is 28.11%, while Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) has a volatility of 57.07%. This indicates that RMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMBS	CD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.11%	57.07%	-28.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.19%	106.07%	-43.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.00%	187.20%	-111.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.40%	151.80%	-96.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.30%	146.04%	-99.74%

Dividends

RMBS vs. CD - Dividend Comparison

Neither RMBS nor CD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMBS and CD in my portfolio?

RMBS and CD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMBS or CD?

CD has higher volatility (57.07%) compared to RMBS (28.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBS dropped -97.16% vs CD's -99.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.