PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBKX vs. VTCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBKX has underperformed VTCLX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while VTCLX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.


RMBKX

1D
1.24%
1M
1.49%
YTD
8.77%
6M
12.83%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
10.38%

VTCLX

1D
0.22%
1M
5.61%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.26%
1Y
28.29%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
8.77%12.84%17.07%4.56%-19.18%56.40%-5.73%22.82%-17.13%12.17%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
11.31%17.44%23.76%26.62%-19.07%26.87%21.08%31.47%-4.98%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBKX and VTCLX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.61

The correlation between RMBKX and VTCLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBKX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBKX
RMBKX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RMBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VTCLX
VTCLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VTCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMBKXVTCLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.32

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

15.43

-6.30

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the VTCLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBKX and VTCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMBKXVTCLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.43

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.79

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.85

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.53

-0.03

Drawdowns

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, roughly equal to the maximum VTCLX drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and VTCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBKXVTCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-55.18%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-8.79%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-19.01%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.33%

-24.98%

-19.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.45%

-34.56%

-20.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-7.57%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

1.89%

+1.70%

Volatility

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) at 2.86%. This indicates that RMBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBKXVTCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

2.86%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

9.09%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.86%

12.01%

+8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.85%

17.22%

+7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

18.28%

+8.88%

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VTCLX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBKX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison

RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than VTCLX's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
5.72%6.22%1.90%1.29%17.29%1.35%0.00%0.85%5.39%6.63%1.50%0.00%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
0.85%0.93%1.04%1.24%1.47%1.04%1.32%1.52%1.83%1.57%1.76%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMBKX and VTCLX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMBKX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to VTCLX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBKX dropped -55.45% vs VTCLX's -55.18%.

VTCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBKX and VTCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer