RMBKX vs. FAFDX
Compare and contrast key facts about RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX).
RMBKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 7, 1999. FAFDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
RMBKX vs. FAFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMBKX vs. FAFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | -0.36% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | -9.46% | 14.91% | 39.01% | 14.03% | -8.93% | 32.90% | -0.25% | 33.77% | -16.09% | 20.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than FAFDX's -9.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBKX has underperformed FAFDX with an annualized return of 9.85%, while FAFDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.
RMBKX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
FAFDX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMBKX vs. FAFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FAFDX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMBKX vs. FAFDX — Risk / Return Rank
RMBKX
FAFDX
RMBKX vs. FAFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMBKX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.25 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 0.47 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 0.22 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 0.68 | +3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMBKX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.25 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.52 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.54 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.29 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBKX and FAFDX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMBKX vs. FAFDX - Dividend Comparison
RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than FAFDX's 7.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 6.24% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | 7.66% | 6.93% | 9.59% | 2.29% | 5.93% | 4.21% | 2.47% | 1.21% | 4.00% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
RMBKX vs. FAFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum FAFDX drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and FAFDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBKX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -75.69% | +20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -14.39% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.33% | -25.14% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.45% | -45.99% | -9.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -12.19% | +4.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -17.73% | +6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.64% | -0.26% |
Volatility
RMBKX vs. FAFDX - Volatility Comparison
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) at 4.51%. This indicates that RMBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMBKX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 4.51% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | 12.41% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 21.13% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 21.12% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 23.83% | +3.27% |