PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBKX vs. BDMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than BDMAX's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBKX has outperformed BDMAX with an annualized return of 11.37%, while BDMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.


RMBKX

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.14%
6M
16.12%
YTD
20.12%
1Y
43.23%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
12.68%

BDMAX

1D
1.16%
1M
1.62%
6M
10.73%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
8.21%
ALL TIME*
6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
20.12%12.84%17.07%4.56%-19.18%56.40%-5.73%22.82%-17.13%12.17%
BDMAX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A
11.82%18.08%21.12%14.27%1.57%3.11%-0.05%-1.02%1.86%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBKX and BDMAX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.04

The correlation between RMBKX and BDMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (10 years) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBKX vs. BDMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMBKX
RMBKX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RMBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMAX
BDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMBKXBDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.60

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

7.28

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

19.24

-7.97

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the BDMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBKX and BDMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than BDMAX's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and BDMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBKXBDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-12.37%

-43.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-3.25%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-4.15%

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.33%

-5.56%

-38.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.45%

-9.71%

-45.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.15%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

-2.80%

-8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.23%

+2.22%

Volatility

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Volatility Comparison

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A (BDMAX) at 2.58%. This indicates that RMBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBKXBDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

2.58%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

5.36%

+7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.41%

7.39%

+13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.66%

6.67%

+17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.18%

5.90%

+21.28%

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than BDMAX's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBKX vs. BDMAX - Dividend Comparison

RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than BDMAX's 11.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMAX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Investor A
11.66%8.94%13.39%7.14%0.00%1.25%0.04%6.60%0.85%0.00%0.00%1.56%
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
5.18%6.22%1.90%1.29%17.29%1.35%0.00%0.85%5.39%6.63%1.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMBKX and BDMAX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMBKX has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to BDMAX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBKX dropped -55.45% vs BDMAX's -12.37%.

BDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBKX and BDMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer