RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L
RMAP.L (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) and ESGP.L (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both Precious Metals funds from HANetf - RMAP.L tracks the Gold while ESGP.L tracks the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RMAP.L returned 27.73%/yr vs 33.25%/yr for ESGP.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMAP.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.L.
Performance
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMAP.L achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly higher than ESGP.L's 1.59% return.
RMAP.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 33.07%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGP.L
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 3.07% | 53.50% | 28.00% | 7.09% | 11.74% | 3.14% |
ESGP.L HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 1.59% | 136.71% | 3.17% | -0.39% | 2.14% | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMAP.L and ESGP.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between RMAP.L and ESGP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
RMAP.L
ESGP.L
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) and HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMAP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.22 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 5.62 | -3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMAP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.56 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.60 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMAP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum ESGP.L drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAP.L and ESGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMAP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -36.54% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -28.67% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.31% | -28.67% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.60% | -24.79% | +5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -13.49% | +6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.70% | 11.38% | +2.32% |
Volatility
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) is 5.07%, while HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.L) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that RMAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMAP.L | ESGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 15.32% | -10.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.91% | 32.61% | -12.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.58% | 40.84% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 33.20% | -8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 33.20% | -9.46% |
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMAP.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMAP.L vs. ESGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RMAP.L nor ESGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMAP.L and ESGP.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMAP.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMAP.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.L.
RMAP.L tracks Gold, while ESGP.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for RMAP.L and 0.60% for ESGP.L.
Find the right allocation for RMAP.L and ESGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer