PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RM8U.DE achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than G2X.DE's -1.03% return.


RM8U.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
2.70%
6M
6.12%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*

G2X.DE

1D
1.09%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-1.03%
6M
7.25%
1Y
61.18%
3Y*
37.60%
5Y*
20.05%
10Y*
13.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RM8U.DE
HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC
2.70%48.89%34.03%9.20%6.98%3.69%4.48%
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
-1.03%131.13%17.55%5.59%-0.02%-4.26%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RM8U.DE and G2X.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.73

The correlation between RM8U.DE and G2X.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RM8U.DE
RM8U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

G2X.DE
G2X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RM8U.DEG2X.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.18

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

5.49

-0.91

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RM8U.DE and G2X.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RM8U.DEG2X.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.42

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.60

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.44

+0.57

Drawdowns

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RM8U.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.51%, smaller than the maximum G2X.DE drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RM8U.DE and G2X.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RM8U.DEG2X.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.51%

-46.04%

+27.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-27.90%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-27.90%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-38.55%

+22.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.01%

-23.34%

+8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-19.92%

+13.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

11.09%

-4.54%

Volatility

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) is 5.04%, while VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a volatility of 13.57%. This indicates that RM8U.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G2X.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RM8U.DEG2X.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

13.57%

-8.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

34.36%

-14.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

42.64%

-19.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

33.16%

-17.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

32.33%

-16.16%

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RM8U.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than G2X.DE's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

RM8U.DE vs. G2X.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RM8U.DE nor G2X.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RM8U.DE and G2X.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RM8U.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RM8U.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for G2X.DE.

RM8U.DE tracks Gold, while G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for RM8U.DE and 0.53% for G2X.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RM8U.DE and G2X.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer