PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G2X.DE vs. SLVP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

G2X.DE is traded in EUR, while SLVP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2X.DE achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 3.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with G2X.DE having a 13.93% annualized return and SLVP not far behind at 13.43%.


G2X.DE

1D
-2.22%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-2.10%
6M
5.92%
1Y
60.57%
3Y*
37.03%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*
13.93%

SLVP

1D
-4.94%
1M
2.14%
YTD
3.47%
6M
13.71%
1Y
107.85%
3Y*
48.04%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
-2.10%131.13%17.55%5.59%-0.02%-4.26%13.26%40.97%-4.37%-5.31%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
3.47%166.91%22.03%-5.24%-12.98%-17.81%43.55%40.82%-18.44%-8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between G2X.DE and SLVP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.68

The correlation between G2X.DE and SLVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G2X.DE vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G2X.DE
G2X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


G2X.DESLVPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.38

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

8.64

-3.15

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2X.DE and SLVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


G2X.DESLVPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.12

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.43

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.34

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.12

+0.32

Drawdowns

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2X.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -75.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2X.DE and SLVP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G2X.DESLVPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-75.87%

+29.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.90%

-32.12%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.90%

-32.12%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.55%

-48.53%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

-61.62%

+15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.17%

-24.88%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-39.20%

+19.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.00%

12.53%

-1.53%

Volatility

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) is 14.82%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 16.79%. This indicates that G2X.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G2X.DESLVPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.82%

16.79%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.43%

41.49%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.64%

51.27%

-8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.15%

40.27%

-7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.33%

40.21%

-7.88%

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2X.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

G2X.DE vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

G2X.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
1.74%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


G2X.DE and SLVP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for G2X.DE.

G2X.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SLVP is Silver. G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for G2X.DE and 0.39% for SLVP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G2X.DE and SLVP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer