PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) and HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RM8U.DE
HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC
9.92%48.89%34.03%9.20%6.98%6.87%
7RIP.DE
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF
-7.16%5.32%33.59%26.46%-14.00%-9.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RM8U.DE achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than 7RIP.DE's -7.16% return.


RM8U.DE

1D
2.80%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
9.92%
6M
24.81%
1Y
41.93%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
22.59%
10Y*

7RIP.DE

1D
3.54%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
-7.16%
6M
2.15%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RM8U.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than 7RIP.DE's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RM8U.DE
RM8U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RM8U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

7RIP.DE
7RIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) and HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RM8U.DE7RIP.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

0.60

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

0.99

+1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

0.99

+1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.74

2.77

+6.97

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the 7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RM8U.DE and 7RIP.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RM8U.DE7RIP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.60

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.22

+0.91

Correlation

The correlation between RM8U.DE and 7RIP.DE is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RM8U.DE nor 7RIP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RM8U.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.51%, smaller than the maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RM8U.DE and 7RIP.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RM8U.DE7RIP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.51%

-31.05%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-15.15%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-10.83%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-9.39%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

4.94%

-0.57%

Volatility

RM8U.DE vs. 7RIP.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) at 7.71%. This indicates that RM8U.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 7RIP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RM8U.DE7RIP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

7.71%

+3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.98%

14.79%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.69%

24.02%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

24.72%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

24.72%

-8.61%