G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE).
G2X.DE and PPFB.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. G2X.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners. It was launched on Mar 25, 2015. PPFB.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both G2X.DE and PPFB.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2X.DE VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | 11.28% | 131.13% | 17.55% | 5.59% | -0.02% | -3.45% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 9.95% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 3.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G2X.DE achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 9.95% return.
G2X.DE
- 1D
- 7.35%
- 1M
- -13.52%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 97.42%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 25.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.18%
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 42.13%
- 3Y*
- 31.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
G2X.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
G2X.DE
PPFB.DE
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| G2X.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 1.76 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 2.25 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 2.58 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | 9.80 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| G2X.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 1.76 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.43 | -0.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between G2X.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither G2X.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G2X.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2X.DE and PPFB.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| G2X.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.04% | -16.60% | -29.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.90% | -16.60% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.80% | -9.03% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -4.12% | -15.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 4.36% | +3.60% |
Volatility
G2X.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.77% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 11.24%. This indicates that G2X.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| G2X.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.77% | 11.24% | +6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.95% | 21.09% | +14.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.45% | 23.78% | +18.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 16.06% | +16.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.41% | 16.06% | +16.35% |