RM vs. FINV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RM (Regional Management Corp.) and FINV (FinVolution Group) are both stocks. Both operate in the Credit Services industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, RM returned -2.37%/yr vs -5.10%/yr for FINV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RM vs. FINV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regional Management Corp. (RM) and FinVolution Group (FINV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RM achieves a -6.56% return, which is significantly lower than FINV's 4.31% return.

RM

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 2.74%
• YTD: -6.56%
• 6M: -2.20%
• 1Y: 39.69%
• 3Y*: 13.75%
• 5Y*: -2.37%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

FINV

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: 9.99%
• 1Y: -35.21%
• 3Y*: 13.17%
• 5Y*: -5.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RM vs. FINV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RM Regional Management Corp.	-6.56%	18.11%	41.51%	-6.63%	-49.62%	96.32%	0.26%	24.86%	-8.59%	14.09%
FINV FinVolution Group	4.31%	-20.07%	45.47%	4.39%	6.39%	89.23%	8.51%	-22.85%	-49.37%	-45.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RM and FINV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017	0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap RM : $343.77M FINV : $1.32B
EPS RM : $4.93 FINV : $8.34
PE Ratio RM : 7.21 FINV : 0.62
PEG Ratio RM : 0.54 FINV : 0.22
PS Ratio RM : 0.53 FINV : 0.10
PB Ratio RM : 0.91 FINV : 0.08
Total Revenue (TTM) RM : $659.90M FINV : $13.24B
Gross Profit (TTM) RM : $430.02M FINV : $10.21B
EBITDA (TTM) RM : $117.08M FINV : $2.61B

Return for Risk

RM vs. FINV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RM

RM Risk / Return Rank: 65
RM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
RM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

FINV

FINV Risk / Return Rank: 16
FINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FINV Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FINV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RM vs. FINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regional Management Corp. (RM) and FinVolution Group (FINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RM	FINV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	-0.72	+1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	-0.89	+2.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.89	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	-0.63	+1.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.43	-0.86	+3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RM vs. FINV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RM Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the FINV Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RM and FINV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RM	FINV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	-0.72	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	-0.10	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	-0.08	+0.24

Drawdowns

RM vs. FINV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RM drawdown since its inception was -71.80%, smaller than the maximum FINV drawdown of -89.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RM and FINV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RM	FINV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.80%	-89.64%	+17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.05%	-56.42%	+25.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.09%	-56.42%	+18.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.63%	-70.54%	+5.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.46%	-48.53%	+15.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.67%	-53.71%	+20.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.09%	40.84%	-24.75%

Volatility

RM vs. FINV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regional Management Corp. (RM) is 9.86%, while FinVolution Group (FINV) has a volatility of 18.89%. This indicates that RM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RM	FINV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.86%	18.89%	-9.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.05%	33.81%	-3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.94%	48.97%	-9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.68%	50.22%	-8.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.86%	71.86%	-26.00%

Dividends

RM vs. FINV - Dividend Comparison

RM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than FINV's 5.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FINV FinVolution Group	5.96%	5.30%	3.49%	4.39%	4.13%	3.45%	4.49%	7.17%
RM Regional Management Corp.	3.37%	3.10%	3.53%	4.78%	4.27%	1.65%	0.67%	0.00%

Financials

RM vs. FINV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regional Management Corp. and FinVolution Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 167.29M and revenue of 167.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

FINV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

RM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported an operating income of 37.76M and revenue of 167.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

FINV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported an operating income of 526.49M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

RM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 167.29M, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

FINV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FinVolution Group reported a net income of 412.55M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RM and FINV in my portfolio?

RM and FINV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RM or FINV?

FINV has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to RM (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RM dropped -71.80% vs FINV's -89.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.