RM vs. AVAV
RM (Regional Management Corp.) and AVAV (AeroVironment, Inc.) are both stocks. RM operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while AVAV operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, RM returned 7.47%/yr vs 18.22%/yr for AVAV. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RM vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RM achieves a -15.26% return, which is significantly higher than AVAV's -38.25% return. Over the past 10 years, RM has underperformed AVAV with an annualized return of 7.47%, while AVAV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.22% annualized return.
RM
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -22.54%
- 6M
- -11.37%
- YTD
- -15.26%
- 1Y
- 1.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.14%
- 5Y*
- -5.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.03%
AVAV
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -21.75%
- 6M
- -46.35%
- YTD
- -38.25%
- 1Y
- -42.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 18.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $190.78M | $258.41M | $271.62M | |
| $3.55M | $3.37M | $2.63M |
RM vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RM Regional Management Corp. | -15.26% | 18.11% | 41.51% | -6.63% | -49.62% | 96.32% | 0.26% | 24.86% | -8.59% | 0.11% |
AVAV AeroVironment, Inc. | -38.25% | 57.18% | 22.10% | 47.14% | 38.09% | -28.62% | 40.75% | -9.14% | 20.99% | 109.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between RM and AVAV is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between RM and AVAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RM:
$297.15M
AVAV:
$7.56B
RM:
$5.05
AVAV:
-$5.41
RM:
0.47
AVAV:
5.17
RM:
0.82
AVAV:
1.71
RM:
$670.46M
AVAV:
$1.42B
RM:
$504.81M
AVAV:
$246.70M
RM:
$199.41M
AVAV:
-$6.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RM vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank
RM
AVAV
RM vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regional Management Corp. (RM) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RM | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | -0.67 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | -1.08 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RM vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RM drawdown since its inception was -71.80%, which is greater than AVAV's maximum drawdown of -66.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RM and AVAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RM | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.80% | -66.65% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.05% | -66.65% | +35.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.66% | -66.65% | +33.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.63% | -66.65% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.80% | -66.65% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.65% | -63.55% | +23.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -28.94% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.88% | 40.94% | -24.06% |
Volatility
RM vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison
Regional Management Corp. (RM) has a higher volatility of 28.73% compared to AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) at 23.79%. This indicates that RM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RM | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.73% | 23.79% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.82% | 59.10% | -18.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.83% | 74.38% | -27.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.85% | 57.67% | -14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.10% | 52.98% | -6.88% |
Dividends
RM vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison
RM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, while AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVAV AeroVironment, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RM Regional Management Corp. | 3.72% | 3.10% | 3.53% | 4.78% | 4.27% | 1.65% | 0.67% |
Financials
RM vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regional Management Corp. and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RM vs. AVAV - Profitability Comparison
RM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 160.75M and revenue of 168.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.7%.
AVAV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported an operating income of 90.42M and revenue of 168.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.8%.
AVAV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.94M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.
RM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a net income of 10.98M and revenue of 168.01M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
AVAV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a net income of -24.10M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RM and AVAV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RM has higher volatility (28.73%) compared to AVAV (23.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RM dropped -71.80% vs AVAV's -66.65%.
RM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RM and AVAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer