PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLY vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLY vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RLY has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 8.56%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.


RLY

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
17.13%
6M
18.27%
1Y
31.78%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
8.56%

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLY vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
17.13%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%15.63%-11.72%10.40%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RLY and YCS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012

0.00

The correlation between RLY and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (3 years) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLY vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLY vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLYYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.35

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.60

3.97

+4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.17

12.40

+18.77

RLY vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLY Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLY and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLYYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17

1.92

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.12

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.33

+0.05

Drawdowns

RLY vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLYYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.75%

-49.56%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

-8.30%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-23.05%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

-27.32%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

-27.32%

-6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

0.00%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-19.93%

+10.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.66%

-1.64%

Volatility

RLY vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that RLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLYYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

2.75%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

12.32%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

17.27%

-7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

21.10%

-7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

19.01%

-5.20%

RLY vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLY vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.86%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLY and YCS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLY has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLY dropped -37.75% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 8.56% for RLY. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

RLY is categorized as Hedge Fund, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 1.00% for YCS.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLY and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer