RLY vs. ADME
RLY (State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) and ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds - RLY tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index while ADME tracks the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RLY returned 7.97%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for ADME. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RLY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ADME.
Performance
RLY vs. ADME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly higher than ADME's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RLY has underperformed ADME with an annualized return of 7.97%, while ADME has yielded a comparatively higher 8.51% annualized return.
RLY
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
ADME
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
RLY vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 14.04% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | -0.59% | 15.63% | -11.72% | 10.40% |
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 9.07% | 10.28% | 22.11% | 15.42% | -21.80% | 20.24% | 18.21% | 9.31% | -6.05% | 17.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLY and ADME is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016 | 0.49 |
The correlation between RLY and ADME shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLY vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank
RLY
ADME
RLY vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLY | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.13 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.91 | 8.50 | +3.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLY vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than ADME's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and ADME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLY | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | -27.49% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -7.49% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.08% | -15.67% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | -23.43% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.17% | -27.49% | -6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.20% | -1.39% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -7.86% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.88% | +0.17% |
Volatility
RLY vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) is 3.10%, while Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that RLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLY | ADME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 3.49% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 8.72% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 10.75% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 13.01% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 14.44% | -0.65% |
RLY vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ADME's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLY vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison
RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than ADME's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% | 0.00% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.10% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLY and ADME have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADME has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to RLY (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLY dropped -37.75% vs ADME's -27.49%.
On 10-year performance, ADME leads with 8.51% vs 7.97% for RLY. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ADME has performed better with a 8.51% return vs 7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.
RLY has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.35% for ADME.
RLY tracks Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while ADME tracks Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RLY and 0.79% for ADME.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLY and ADME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer