RLTY vs. NVO
RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) and NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) are both stocks. RLTY operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while NVO operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, RLTY returned 14.37%/yr vs -16.67%/yr for NVO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RLTY vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -12.15% return.
RLTY
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVO
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- -12.15%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- 1Y
- -38.72%
- 3Y*
- -16.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
RLTY vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 9.57% | 8.56% | 15.40% | 14.05% | -28.45% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -12.15% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 40.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLTY and NVO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLTY vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
RLTY
NVO
RLTY vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLTY | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.87 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | -0.77 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | -1.20 | +4.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLTY vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLTY | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -74.70% | +39.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -50.59% | +39.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.81% | -74.70% | +53.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -68.62% | +66.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -17.81% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 32.66% | -29.23% |
Volatility
RLTY vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) is 3.99%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that RLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLTY | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 10.13% | -6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 37.86% | -27.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 51.56% | -38.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 38.34% | -15.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 32.53% | -9.86% |
Dividends
RLTY vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.55%, more than NVO's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.17% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 8.55% | 8.98% | 8.93% | 9.18% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RLTY vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RLTY and NVO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVO has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to RLTY (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLTY dropped -35.44% vs NVO's -74.70%.
RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLTY and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer