RLSIX vs. LONGX
RLSIX (RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund) and LONGX (Longboard Alternative Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, RLSIX returned 6.72%/yr vs 24.95%/yr for LONGX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RLSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for LONGX.
Performance
RLSIX vs. LONGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLSIX achieves a -5.17% return, which is significantly lower than LONGX's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RLSIX has underperformed LONGX with an annualized return of 6.72%, while LONGX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.95% annualized return.
RLSIX
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -5.17%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- 1Y
- 1.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- -6.06%
- 10Y*
- 6.72%
LONGX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 16.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 24.95%
RLSIX vs. LONGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | -5.17% | 8.57% | 16.06% | 43.85% | -53.89% | 2.10% | 54.74% | 20.00% | -2.20% | 22.10% |
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund | 12.82% | 1.49% | 14.95% | 5.64% | -13.21% | 13.89% | 27.70% | 13.82% | 270.32% | 19.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLSIX and LONGX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2015 | 0.49 |
The correlation between RLSIX and LONGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLSIX vs. LONGX — Risk / Return Rank
RLSIX
LONGX
RLSIX vs. LONGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLSIX | LONGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.28 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 2.39 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 9.18 | -8.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLSIX vs. LONGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLSIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum LONGX drawdown of -77.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLSIX and LONGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLSIX | LONGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -77.16% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | -7.09% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -14.57% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.82% | -19.28% | -41.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.82% | -77.16% | +16.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.69% | -0.06% | -29.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -7.34% | -7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 1.84% | +3.28% |
Volatility
RLSIX vs. LONGX - Volatility Comparison
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) at 3.22%. This indicates that RLSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LONGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLSIX | LONGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 3.22% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 8.50% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 10.91% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 11.91% | +13.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 137.79% | -116.23% |
RLSIX vs. LONGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LONGX's 1.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLSIX vs. LONGX - Dividend Comparison
Neither RLSIX nor LONGX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.40% | 7.64% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.10% | 268.50% | 23.29% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 11.66% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLSIX and LONGX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLSIX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to LONGX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLSIX dropped -60.82% vs LONGX's -77.16%.
LONGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLSIX and LONGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer