RLGT vs. PSLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 10 years, RLGT returned 9.83%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RLGT vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a 33.49% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's -1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, RLGT has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of 9.83%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.

RLGT

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: 10.60%
• YTD: 33.49%
• 6M: 31.01%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 2.55%
• 10Y*: 9.83%

PSLV

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: 18.46%
• 1Y: 100.09%
• 3Y*: 41.73%
• 5Y*: 18.43%
• 10Y*: 13.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLGT vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc.	33.49%	-5.52%	0.90%	30.45%	-30.18%	25.69%	4.13%	31.06%	-7.61%	17.95%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	-1.78%	145.08%	19.43%	-1.94%	2.74%	-14.13%	42.81%	16.99%	-11.83%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RLGT and PSLV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap RLGT : $410.18M PSLV : $14.73B
EPS RLGT : $0.33 PSLV : $13.57
PE Ratio RLGT : 25.42 PSLV : 1.71
PEG Ratio RLGT : 0.91 PSLV : 0.00
PS Ratio RLGT : 0.46 PSLV : 218.98
PB Ratio RLGT : 1.75 PSLV : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) RLGT : $893.50M PSLV : $64.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) RLGT : $113.69M PSLV : $404.67M
EBITDA (TTM) RLGT : $27.72M PSLV : $8.21B

Return for Risk

RLGT vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLGT

RLGT Risk / Return Rank: 71
RLGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RLGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
RLGT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RLGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RLGT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

PSLV

PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 79
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLGT vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLGT	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.72	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.96	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.32	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	2.48	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	5.50	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLGT vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLGT Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLGT and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLGT	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	1.72	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.52	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.45	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.17	0.00

Drawdowns

RLGT vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than PSLV's maximum drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and PSLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLGT	PSLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.68%	-79.38%	-13.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.44%	-40.65%	+23.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.53%	-40.65%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.29%	-40.65%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.67%	-42.79%	-13.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-36.11%	+33.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.91%	-58.15%	+25.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.08%	18.25%	-10.17%

Volatility

RLGT vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) is 13.03%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that RLGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLGT	PSLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.03%	16.57%	-3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.88%	57.35%	-26.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.17%	58.49%	-20.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.38%	35.64%	+2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.09%	31.14%	+12.95%

Dividends

RLGT vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither RLGT nor PSLV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLGT and PSLV in my portfolio?

RLGT and PSLV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RLGT or PSLV?

PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to RLGT (13.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLGT dropped -92.68% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.