PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLBGX vs. FGTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6 (FGTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLBGX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than FGTKX's 9.08% return.


RLBGX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.99%
YTD
10.11%
6M
10.77%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
10.48%

FGTKX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.38%
YTD
9.08%
6M
10.11%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
10.11%18.83%15.35%13.92%-11.85%16.10%11.20%18.95%-3.07%7.11%
FGTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6
9.08%17.95%12.72%15.72%-16.78%11.76%15.91%22.06%-6.81%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between RLBGX and FGTKX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.93

The correlation between RLBGX and FGTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLBGX vs. FGTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLBGX
RLBGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
RLBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RLBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FGTKX
FGTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FGTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6 (FGTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLBGXFGTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.49

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

3.20

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.84

13.96

+2.88

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLBGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the FGTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLBGX and FGTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLBGXFGTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

2.51

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.70

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.80

+0.18

Drawdowns

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLBGX drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum FGTKX drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLBGX and FGTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLBGXFGTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-24.66%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-6.86%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-9.98%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

-24.18%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-4.80%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.57%

-0.03%

Volatility

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) is 2.64%, while Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6 (FGTKX) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that RLBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLBGXFGTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.18%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

7.25%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

8.75%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.49%

10.82%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

11.71%

-1.04%

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLBGX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FGTKX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

RLBGX vs. FGTKX - Dividend Comparison

RLBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than FGTKX's 6.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6
6.34%5.75%6.28%2.18%10.38%11.19%6.49%7.08%7.77%3.24%0.00%0.00%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
7.81%8.56%7.50%2.27%2.63%4.59%4.65%3.78%5.81%4.92%4.54%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RLBGX and FGTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGTKX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to RLBGX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLBGX dropped -22.33% vs FGTKX's -24.66%.

RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLBGX and FGTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer