RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO
RLB.TO (RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF) and XAGH.TO (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Total Bond Market funds. RLB.TO is actively managed, while XAGH.TO is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RLB.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.15%
XAGH.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RLB.TO RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF | 0.54% |
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLB.TO and XAGH.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RLB.TO
XAGH.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF (RLB.TO) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLB.TO | XAGH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.93%, which is greater than XAGH.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLB.TO and XAGH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLB.TO | XAGH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -3.18% | -10.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -2.22% | +2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -1.43% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | — | — |
Volatility
RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLB.TO | XAGH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34% | 5.21% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.01% | 5.21% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 5.21% | -0.81% |
Dividends
RLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Dividend Comparison
RLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than XAGH.TO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLB.TO RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF | 3.47% | 3.25% | 2.99% | 2.65% | 2.54% | 2.27% | 2.44% | 2.66% | 2.81% | 2.95% | 2.32% |
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLB.TO and XAGH.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: RBC and iShares.
Find the right allocation for RLB.TO and XAGH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer