PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RL vs. III.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RL vs. III.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and 3I Group plc (III.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RL is traded in USD, while III.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the III.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than III.L's -29.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RL having a 18.35% annualized return and III.L not far ahead at 19.21%.


RL

1D
2.72%
1M
21.82%
YTD
14.56%
6M
9.70%
1Y
52.96%
3Y*
52.12%
5Y*
29.57%
10Y*
18.35%

III.L

1D
3.61%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
-29.56%
6M
-26.02%
1Y
-44.56%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
19.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RL vs. III.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
14.56%55.03%62.85%39.82%-8.41%16.66%-10.63%16.07%1.82%17.53%
III.L
3I Group plc
-29.56%0.62%47.61%95.24%-13.78%27.82%12.71%53.02%-16.76%46.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RL and III.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RL:

$25.17B

III.L:

£23.50B

EPS

RL:

$15.08

III.L:

£10.41

PE Ratio

RL:

26.79

III.L:

2.22

PEG Ratio

RL:

1.49

III.L:

0.27

PS Ratio

RL:

3.11

III.L:

10.82

PB Ratio

RL:

8.86

III.L:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

RL:

$8.11B

III.L:

£2.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RL:

$5.67B

III.L:

£5.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

RL:

$1.18B

III.L:

£9.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RL vs. III.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RL
RL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

III.L
III.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
III.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
III.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
III.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
III.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RL vs. III.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and 3I Group plc (III.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLIII.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.80

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

-0.85

+3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

-1.67

+11.32

RL vs. III.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the III.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RL and III.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RL vs. III.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum III.L drawdown of -88.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and III.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLIII.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.62%

-88.62%

+20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-52.57%

+34.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.18%

-52.57%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-52.57%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.14%

-54.36%

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-47.55%

+47.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.11%

-27.21%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

26.69%

-21.19%

Volatility

RL vs. III.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is 16.13%, while 3I Group plc (III.L) has a volatility of 19.15%. This indicates that RL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than III.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLIII.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.13%

19.15%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.42%

37.86%

-10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.57%

43.99%

-9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

33.13%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.73%

33.07%

+5.66%

Dividends

RL vs. III.L - Dividend Comparison

RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than III.L's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
III.L
3I Group plc
3.42%2.42%1.82%2.32%3.76%2.78%3.02%3.42%4.78%2.90%3.41%2.37%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
0.90%1.01%1.40%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%

Financials

RL vs. III.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ralph Lauren Corporation and 3I Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.98B
236.00M
(RL) Total Revenue
(III.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RL values in USD, III.L values in GBP

Frequently Asked Questions


RL and III.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RL and III.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer