III.L vs. BRK-B
Compare and contrast key facts about 3I Group plc (III.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B).
Performance
III.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
III.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III.L 3I Group plc | -20.81% | -6.44% | 50.11% | 85.46% | -3.46% | 28.99% | 9.36% | 47.12% | -12.49% | 32.12% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -3.23% | 2.99% | 29.31% | 9.69% | 15.59% | 30.17% | -0.64% | 6.71% | 9.11% | 11.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
III.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
III.L:
£25.00B
BRK-B:
$1.03T
III.L:
£10.84
BRK-B:
$31.03
III.L:
2.38
BRK-B:
15.42
III.L:
0.07
BRK-B:
0.60
III.L:
6.06
BRK-B:
2.78
III.L:
0.89
BRK-B:
1.44
III.L:
£4.13B
BRK-B:
$371.37B
III.L:
£7.39B
BRK-B:
$116.89B
III.L:
£10.11B
BRK-B:
$87.30B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, III.L achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -3.23% return. Over the past 10 years, III.L has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 22.55%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.58% annualized return.
III.L
- 1D
- 5.99%
- 1M
- -20.07%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -36.91%
- 1Y
- -27.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 22.55%
BRK-B
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -12.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
III.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
III.L
BRK-B
III.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3I Group plc (III.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| III.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | -0.66 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | -0.80 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.73 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | -1.11 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| III.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 | -0.66 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.84 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.69 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between III.L and BRK-B is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
III.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
III.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III.L 3I Group plc | 3.06% | 2.42% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 3.76% | 2.78% | 3.02% | 3.42% | 3.75% | 1.75% | 2.64% | 1.68% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
III.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum III.L drawdown since its inception was -84.42%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III.L and BRK-B.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| III.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.42% | -53.86% | -30.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.86% | -14.95% | -32.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.86% | -26.58% | -21.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.08% | -29.57% | -19.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.39% | -11.36% | -30.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.61% | -11.07% | -15.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.64% | 8.72% | +9.92% |
Volatility
III.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
3I Group plc (III.L) has a higher volatility of 24.36% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.68%. This indicates that III.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| III.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.36% | 4.68% | +19.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.37% | 12.29% | +25.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.00% | 18.95% | +22.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.65% | 16.95% | +12.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.79% | 19.84% | +9.95% |
Financials
III.L vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3I Group plc and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities