RKT.L vs. MA
RKT.L (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) and MA (Mastercard Incorporated) are both stocks. RKT.L operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while MA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RKT.L returned -1.40%/yr vs 19.32%/yr for MA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RKT.L vs. MA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RKT.L is traded in GBp, while MA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RKT.L achieves a -25.78% return, which is significantly lower than MA's -12.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RKT.L has underperformed MA with an annualized return of -1.40%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 19.32% annualized return.
RKT.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -25.78%
- 6M
- -24.52%
- 1Y
- -11.49%
- 3Y*
- -6.65%
- 5Y*
- -4.27%
- 10Y*
- -1.40%
MA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- -12.83%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -15.12%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 19.32%
RKT.L vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | -25.78% | 29.18% | -6.74% | -2.96% | -6.86% | -0.34% | 9.42% | 4.81% | -10.86% | 2.60% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -13.82% | 1.27% | 26.34% | 17.24% | 8.92% | 2.12% | 16.66% | 53.10% | 32.74% | 34.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKT.L and MA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
RKT.L:
£29.59B
MA:
$433.70B
RKT.L:
£6.17
MA:
$17.28
RKT.L:
7.35
MA:
28.11
RKT.L:
0.15
MA:
1.64
RKT.L:
1.22
MA:
12.90
RKT.L:
3.82
MA:
64.52
RKT.L:
£24.88B
MA:
$33.94B
RKT.L:
£15.10B
MA:
$26.70B
RKT.L:
£6.67B
MA:
$21.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKT.L vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank
RKT.L
MA
RKT.L vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RKT.L | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.90 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.74 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | -1.54 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RKT.L | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | -0.66 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.34 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.72 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.73 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
RKT.L vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKT.L drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum MA drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT.L and MA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKT.L | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -50.00% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.10% | -20.39% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.10% | -22.74% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.84% | -22.74% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | -34.11% | -7.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.20% | -19.06% | -14.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -7.73% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.02% | 9.84% | +2.18% |
Volatility
RKT.L vs. MA - Volatility Comparison
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.57%. This indicates that RKT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKT.L | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 6.57% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.98% | 18.25% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 23.02% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 23.45% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 26.87% | -4.50% |
Dividends
RKT.L vs. MA - Dividend Comparison
RKT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than MA's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.67% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | 10.15% | 3.30% | 3.90% | 3.31% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.98% |
Financials
RKT.L vs. MA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RKT.L vs. MA - Profitability Comparison
RKT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.37B and revenue of 7.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
MA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
RKT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.72B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.
MA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.
RKT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.22B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
MA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RKT.L and MA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RKT.L and MA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer