RKT.L vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RKT.L or PG.
Key characteristics
RKT.L | PG | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -12.73% | 21.14% |
1Y Return | -19.53% | 17.85% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -5.15% | 9.38% |
5Y Return (Ann) | -3.39% | 9.89% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 1.52% | 10.52% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.70 | 1.07 |
Daily Std Dev | 27.93% | 15.32% |
Max Drawdown | -66.15% | -54.46% |
Current Drawdown | -34.55% | -2.01% |
Fundamentals
RKT.L | PG | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | £31.74B | $403.07B |
EPS | £2.17 | $6.02 |
PE Ratio | 21.09 | 28.50 |
PEG Ratio | 2.40 | 3.56 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | £14.33B | $84.04B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | £8.65B | $43.19B |
EBITDA (TTM) | £3.75B | $22.94B |
Correlation
The correlation between RKT.L and PG is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RKT.L vs. PG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RKT.L achieves a -12.73% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 21.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RKT.L has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 1.52%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RKT.L vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RKT.L vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
RKT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than PG's 2.24% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | 4.35% | 3.45% | 3.03% | 2.75% | 2.67% | 2.83% | 2.80% | 2.34% | 2.13% | 2.06% | 2.63% | 2.95% |
The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.24% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% | 2.78% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
RKT.L vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKT.L drawdown since its inception was -66.15%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT.L and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RKT.L vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) is 4.36%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that RKT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RKT.L vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities