RKT.L vs. AAPL
RKT.L (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. RKT.L operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, RKT.L returned -0.95%/yr vs 30.23%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RKT.L is traded in GBp, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RKT.L achieves a -24.11% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 9.54% return. Over the past 10 years, RKT.L has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -0.95%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.23% annualized return.
RKT.L
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- -24.11%
- 6M
- -24.09%
- 1Y
- -10.45%
- 3Y*
- -5.69%
- 5Y*
- -3.94%
- 10Y*
- -0.95%
AAPL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 51.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 30.23%
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | -24.11% | 29.18% | -6.74% | -2.96% | -6.86% | -0.34% | 9.42% | 4.81% | -10.86% | 2.60% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.84% | 1.28% | 32.99% | 41.56% | -17.65% | 35.92% | 76.95% | 81.77% | 0.22% | 35.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKT.L and AAPL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.15 |
The correlation between RKT.L and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RKT.L:
£30.25B
AAPL:
$4.30T
RKT.L:
£6.17
AAPL:
$8.24
RKT.L:
7.51
AAPL:
35.35
RKT.L:
0.15
AAPL:
4.65
RKT.L:
1.25
AAPL:
9.60
RKT.L:
3.91
AAPL:
40.37
RKT.L:
£24.88B
AAPL:
$451.44B
RKT.L:
£15.10B
AAPL:
$216.07B
RKT.L:
£6.67B
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKT.L vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
RKT.L
AAPL
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RKT.L | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.42 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 3.22 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 7.97 | -8.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKT.L drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT.L and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKT.L | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.08% | -49.37% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.10% | -16.06% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.10% | -34.64% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.84% | -34.64% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.08% | -37.00% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.69% | -5.75% | -25.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -10.28% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.51% | 6.47% | +6.04% |
Volatility
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and Apple Inc (AAPL) have volatilities of 6.94% and 6.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKT.L | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 6.73% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 16.62% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.01% | 22.65% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 26.53% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 28.95% | -6.58% |
Dividends
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
RKT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | 9.93% | 3.30% | 3.90% | 3.31% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.98% |
Financials
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RKT.L vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
RKT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.37B and revenue of 7.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
RKT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.72B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
RKT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.22B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RKT.L and AAPL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RKT.L and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer