PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLX vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKLX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLX achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.83% return.


RKLX

1D
-10.27%
1M
-56.29%
YTD
2.51%
6M
-17.39%
1Y
185.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAP

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
12.83%
6M
13.01%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKLX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RKLX and QTAP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

0.40

RKLX vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RKLX
QTAP

Industrials

100.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.7%

Energy

-

0.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

50.7%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Industrials

RKLX
100.0%
QTAP
3.3%

Basic Materials

RKLX

-

QTAP
1.3%

Communication Services

RKLX

-

QTAP
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RKLX

-

QTAP
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

RKLX

-

QTAP
8.7%

Energy

RKLX

-

QTAP
0.7%

Financial Services

RKLX

-

QTAP
0.2%

Healthcare

RKLX

-

QTAP
5.1%

Real Estate

RKLX

-

QTAP
0.1%

Technology

RKLX

-

QTAP
50.7%

Utilities

RKLX

-

QTAP
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKLX
RKLX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKLX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RKLXQTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.94

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

9.04

-6.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

52.85

-48.01

RKLX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RKLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RKLX and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKLX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLX drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLX and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLXQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-29.44%

-42.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.71%

-2.49%

-69.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.12%

-1.70%

-62.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.92%

-4.99%

-21.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.42%

0.43%

+37.99%

Volatility

RKLX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) has a higher volatility of 62.72% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.03%. This indicates that RKLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLXQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

62.72%

3.03%

+59.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

142.12%

4.94%

+137.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.83%

6.12%

+179.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

182.53%

18.92%

+163.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

182.53%

18.72%

+163.81%

RKLX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKLX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKLX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

RKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.58%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RKLX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RKLX has higher volatility (62.72%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RKLX dropped -71.71% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

On 1-year performance, RKLX leads with 185.10% vs 22.41% for QTAP. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RKLX has performed better with a 185.10% return vs 22.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RKLX.

RKLX has the higher dividend yield at 14.58%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RKLX and 0.79% for QTAP.

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLX and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer