RIVRX vs. SWLGX
RIVRX (Riverbridge Growth Fund) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RIVRX returned 1.76%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for SWLGX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RIVRX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.
Performance
RIVRX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIVRX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -0.51% return.
RIVRX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.46%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RIVRX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIVRX Riverbridge Growth Fund | -6.40% | 4.55% | 22.07% | 31.71% | -30.87% | 9.07% | 44.03% | 30.21% | 3.81% | -0.58% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -0.51% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIVRX and SWLGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RIVRX and SWLGX has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIVRX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
RIVRX
SWLGX
RIVRX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIVRX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.08 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.45 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 1.35 | -2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIVRX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIVRX drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVRX and SWLGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIVRX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -32.69% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.59% | -16.16% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | -23.30% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -32.69% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -8.74% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -7.03% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.29% | 5.37% | +2.92% |
Volatility
RIVRX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) is 3.86%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that RIVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIVRX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 6.40% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 14.03% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 17.49% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 21.80% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 22.68% | -2.42% |
RIVRX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIVRX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIVRX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
RIVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.95%, more than SWLGX's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIVRX Riverbridge Growth Fund | 29.95% | 28.03% | 4.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.28% | 3.29% | 1.43% | 7.91% | 0.09% | 3.61% | 2.18% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIVRX and SWLGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWLGX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to RIVRX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVRX dropped -38.45% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.
SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIVRX and SWLGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer