PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIVRX vs. BLUEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVRX achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RIVRX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 11.96%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.


RIVRX

1D
-1.45%
1M
2.20%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
-4.91%
1Y
-0.73%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
11.96%

BLUEX

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
-6.22%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIVRX
Riverbridge Growth Fund
-4.89%4.55%22.07%31.71%-30.87%9.07%44.03%30.21%3.81%25.11%
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
-6.58%4.45%7.24%14.35%-14.30%3.22%34.74%35.34%-4.91%27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVRX and BLUEX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.82

The correlation between RIVRX and BLUEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIVRX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVRX
RIVRX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
RIVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BLUEX
BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIVRXBLUEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.00

-0.67

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.09

-0.88

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.90

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

-0.55

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.00

-1.37

+1.37

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVRX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIVRXBLUEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

-0.67

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.03

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.49

+0.13

Drawdowns

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVRX drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVRX and BLUEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIVRXBLUEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-54.27%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.59%

-12.19%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-12.19%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-21.87%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.45%

-29.06%

-9.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.60%

-8.53%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-13.37%

+6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.04%

4.85%

+2.19%

Volatility

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIVRXBLUEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.48%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

7.75%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

9.98%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

10.62%

+10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

16.59%

+3.69%

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIVRX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIVRX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

RIVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.48%, more than BLUEX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
0.33%0.31%0.29%0.03%11.84%27.20%25.43%13.71%13.40%0.00%0.00%0.24%
RIVRX
Riverbridge Growth Fund
29.48%28.03%4.56%0.00%0.00%4.28%3.29%1.43%7.91%0.09%3.61%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIVRX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLUEX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to RIVRX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVRX dropped -38.45% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

RIVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIVRX and BLUEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer