RIVRX vs. FCGSX
RIVRX (Riverbridge Growth Fund) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RIVRX returned 11.28%/yr vs 23.21%/yr for FCGSX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RIVRX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.
Performance
RIVRX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIVRX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 15.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RIVRX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.21% annualized return.
RIVRX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.46%
FCGSX
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- 6M
- 12.80%
- YTD
- 15.70%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.31%
- 10Y*
- 23.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RIVRX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIVRX Riverbridge Growth Fund | -6.40% | 4.55% | 22.07% | 31.71% | -30.87% | 9.07% | 44.03% | 30.21% | 3.81% | 25.11% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 15.70% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIVRX and FCGSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RIVRX and FCGSX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIVRX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
RIVRX
FCGSX
RIVRX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIVRX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.28 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.15 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | 11.58 | -12.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIVRX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIVRX drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVRX and FCGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIVRX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -38.77% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.59% | -10.42% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.39% | -26.07% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -38.77% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.45% | -38.77% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -7.07% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -6.92% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.29% | 2.83% | +5.46% |
Volatility
RIVRX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Riverbridge Growth Fund (RIVRX) is 3.86%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that RIVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIVRX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 6.27% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 15.91% | -4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 19.98% | -5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 24.00% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 23.37% | -3.11% |
RIVRX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIVRX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIVRX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
RIVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.95%, more than FCGSX's 9.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 9.06% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
RIVRX Riverbridge Growth Fund | 29.95% | 28.03% | 4.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.28% | 3.29% | 1.43% | 7.91% | 0.09% | 3.61% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIVRX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCGSX has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to RIVRX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVRX dropped -38.45% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.
FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIVRX and FCGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer