PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIVN vs. NBIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIVN vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIVN achieves a -14.97% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 177.59% return.


RIVN

1D
7.85%
1M
17.45%
YTD
-14.97%
6M
-9.01%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
10Y*

NBIS

1D
4.55%
1M
12.10%
YTD
177.59%
6M
164.98%
1Y
362.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIVN vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
-14.97%48.20%31.42%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
177.59%202.18%46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RIVN and NBIS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIVN:

$20.93B

NBIS:

$71.79B

EPS

RIVN:

-$2.90

NBIS:

$3.17

PS Ratio

RIVN:

3.68

NBIS:

69.73

PB Ratio

RIVN:

4.73

NBIS:

9.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIVN:

$5.53B

NBIS:

$877.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIVN:

$57.00M

NBIS:

$420.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

RIVN:

-$3.18B

NBIS:

-$52.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIVN vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIVN
RIVN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIVN vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIVNNBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.42

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

8.03

-7.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

18.34

-17.39

RIVN vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIVN and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIVN vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIVN drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVN and NBIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIVNNBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.12%

-58.27%

-36.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.54%

-45.47%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.26%

-12.15%

-78.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.33%

-18.94%

-67.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.62%

19.86%

+1.76%

Volatility

RIVN vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) is 22.66%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 30.23%. This indicates that RIVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIVNNBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.66%

30.23%

-7.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.82%

71.43%

-21.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.46%

104.41%

-38.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.55%

110.20%

-32.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

77.55%

110.20%

-32.65%

Dividends

RIVN vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIVN nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RIVN vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rivian Automotive, Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.38B
399.00M
(RIVN) Total Revenue
(NBIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RIVN and NBIS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to RIVN (22.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVN dropped -95.12% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIVN and NBIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer