RITGX vs. NEA

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

RITGX (American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6) is High Yield Bonds fund managed by American Funds, while NEA (Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RITGX returned 6.31%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for NEA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RITGX charges 0.32%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for NEA.

Performance

RITGX vs. NEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6 (RITGX) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RITGX achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than NEA's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RITGX has outperformed NEA with an annualized return of 6.31%, while NEA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.01% annualized return.

RITGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 8.09%
• 3Y*: 9.68%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: 6.31%

NEA

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 15.57%
• 3Y*: 9.20%
• 5Y*: -0.07%
• 10Y*: 3.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RITGX vs. NEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RITGX American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6	2.04%	8.69%	9.91%	12.54%	-10.10%	8.74%	7.44%	12.28%	-1.46%	7.70%
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund	3.22%	11.31%	9.50%	0.75%	-23.32%	8.16%	10.07%	22.42%	-5.72%	8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RITGX and NEA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010	0.21

The correlation between RITGX and NEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RITGX vs. NEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RITGX

RITGX Risk / Return Rank: 84
RITGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RITGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RITGX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
RITGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RITGX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

NEA

NEA Risk / Return Rank: 81
NEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
NEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NEA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NEA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RITGX vs. NEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6 (RITGX) and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RITGX	NEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.46	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	2.18	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.29	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	2.15	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.02	8.57	+6.44

RITGX vs. NEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the NEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITGX and NEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RITGX vs. NEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITGX drawdown since its inception was -21.20%, smaller than the maximum NEA drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITGX and NEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RITGX	NEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.20%	-43.83%	+22.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.41%	-7.27%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.92%	-15.16%	+11.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.75%	-36.57%	+22.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.20%	-36.57%	+15.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-4.02%	+3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-8.00%	+5.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	1.82%	-1.28%

Volatility

RITGX vs. NEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6 (RITGX) is 1.05%, while Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that RITGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RITGX	NEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	2.67%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	8.67%	-5.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.51%	10.72%	-7.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.04%	11.52%	-6.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.52%	11.82%	-6.30%

RITGX vs. NEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RITGX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than NEA's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

RITGX vs. NEA - Dividend Comparison

RITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than NEA's 7.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEA Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund	7.13%	7.36%	6.63%	3.95%	5.49%	4.50%	4.45%	4.46%	5.40%	5.33%	5.70%	5.71%
RITGX American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6	6.66%	6.63%	6.66%	6.80%	4.50%	4.65%	6.19%	6.56%	6.68%	6.36%	5.36%	7.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RITGX and NEA in my portfolio?

RITGX and NEA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RITGX or NEA?

NEA has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to RITGX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITGX dropped -21.20% vs NEA's -43.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RITGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.