RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO
RIT.TO (CI Canadian REIT ETF) and XFR.TO (iShares Floating Rate Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIT.TO is a REIT fund actively managed by CI Investments, while XFR.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. RIT.TO is actively managed, while XFR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RIT.TO returned 6.83%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for XFR.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIT.TO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XFR.TO.
Performance
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIT.TO achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly higher than XFR.TO's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RIT.TO has outperformed XFR.TO with an annualized return of 6.83%, while XFR.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.
RIT.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 13.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
XFR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF | 13.24% | 11.98% | 2.51% | 5.37% | -20.71% | 34.40% | -6.80% | 22.86% | 3.94% | 11.79% |
XFR.TO iShares Floating Rate Index ETF | 1.36% | 3.33% | 4.57% | 5.29% | 1.81% | 0.15% | 0.98% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIT.TO and XFR.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2011 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RIT.TO
XFR.TO
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIT.TO | XFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.95 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 28.34 | -26.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 85.60 | -80.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than XFR.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIT.TO and XFR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIT.TO | XFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.76% | -4.12% | -54.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.21% | -0.10% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.16% | -0.30% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.73% | -0.30% | -30.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.90% | -4.12% | -36.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | 0.00% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -0.06% | -9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 0.03% | +2.45% |
Volatility
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) at 0.20%. This indicates that RIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIT.TO | XFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 0.20% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 0.44% | +7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 0.71% | +9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 0.84% | +13.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 1.86% | +13.61% |
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than XFR.TO's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
RIT.TO vs. XFR.TO - Dividend Comparison
RIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than XFR.TO's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF | 4.38% | 4.85% | 5.17% | 5.04% | 5.08% | 3.85% | 4.94% | 4.35% | 5.12% | 5.09% | 5.30% | 4.78% |
XFR.TO iShares Floating Rate Index ETF | 2.73% | 3.23% | 4.93% | 4.91% | 1.84% | 0.30% | 1.07% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 0.92% | 0.65% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIT.TO and XFR.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XFR.TO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XFR.TO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for RIT.TO.
RIT.TO is categorized as REIT, while XFR.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for RIT.TO and 0.14% for XFR.TO.
Find the right allocation for RIT.TO and XFR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer