XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO).
XFR.TO and ZMMK.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XFR.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Dec 6, 2011. ZMMK.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Nov 28, 2021.
Performance
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFR.TO iShares Floating Rate Index ETF | 0.56% | 3.33% | 4.57% | 5.29% | 1.82% | 0.07% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.57% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XFR.TO having a 0.56% return and ZMMK.TO slightly higher at 0.57%.
XFR.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFR.TO has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XFR.TO
ZMMK.TO
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.72 | 10.17 | -6.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.94 | 25.94 | -20.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.84 | 6.05 | -4.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.01 | 86.98 | -76.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.24 | 406.21 | -348.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72 | 10.17 | -6.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 10.37 | -9.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between XFR.TO and ZMMK.TO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison
XFR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than ZMMK.TO's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFR.TO iShares Floating Rate Index ETF | 2.85% | 3.23% | 4.93% | 4.91% | 1.85% | 0.30% | 1.07% | 1.96% | 1.60% | 0.95% | 0.77% | 0.94% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.68% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFR.TO and ZMMK.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -0.16% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -0.03% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.01% | +0.04% |
Volatility
XFR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Floating Rate Index ETF (XFR.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.18% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that XFR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XFR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.08% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.53% | 0.20% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 0.26% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 0.34% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.85% | 0.34% | +1.51% |