RISN vs. MDAA
RISN (Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RISN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
RISN vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISN achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 18.21% return.
RISN
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.68%
MDAA
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 18.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.42K | $4.67K | $40.15K | |
| $120.95K | $182.20K | $596.84K |
RISN vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 9.81% | -2.14% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 18.21% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISN and MDAA is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISN vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
RISN
MDAA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RISN vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISN | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISN vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISN | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -14.59% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.28% | +4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -3.54% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility
RISN vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISN | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 24.52% | -11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 24.52% | -13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 24.52% | -13.11% |
RISN vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISN vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than MDAA's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 1.12% | 0.98% | 1.39% | 2.05% | 1.27% | 9.74% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISN and MDAA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RISN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RISN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.
RISN has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.39% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for RISN and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for RISN and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer