RISN vs. MDAA
RISN (Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RISN charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
RISN vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISN achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 22.13% return.
RISN
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 15.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- —
MDAA
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 22.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RISN vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 6.51% | -2.50% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 22.13% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISN and MDAA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISN vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
RISN
MDAA
RISN vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RISN | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RISN | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.47 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
RISN vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISN | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -14.59% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.11% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -2.93% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility
RISN vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISN | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 23.89% | -11.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.18% | 23.89% | -12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 23.89% | -12.55% |
RISN vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISN vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than MDAA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF | 1.03% | 0.98% | 1.39% | 2.05% | 1.27% | 9.74% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISN and MDAA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RISN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RISN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.
RISN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for RISN and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for RISN and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer