PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RISN vs. HISF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RISN vs. HISF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISN achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly higher than HISF's 0.03% return.


RISN

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.49%
YTD
6.51%
6M
4.83%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*

HISF

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.23%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RISN vs. HISF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
6.51%10.83%3.15%
HISF
First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF
0.03%8.39%3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RISN and HISF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RISN vs. HISF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RISN
RISN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

HISF
HISF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HISF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HISF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RISN vs. HISF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RISNHISFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.99

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

7.21

-0.07

RISN vs. HISF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RISN Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the HISF Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISN and HISF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RISNHISFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.74

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.31

-0.66

Drawdowns

RISN vs. HISF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than HISF's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and HISF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RISNHISFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-3.86%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-2.90%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.20%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-0.89%

-6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

0.80%

+1.39%

Volatility

RISN vs. HISF - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) at 1.21%. This indicates that RISN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RISNHISFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

1.21%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

2.61%

+6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

3.32%

+8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.18%

3.95%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

3.95%

+7.39%

RISN vs. HISF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than HISF's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

RISN vs. HISF - Dividend Comparison

RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than HISF's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HISF
First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF
5.00%4.69%3.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
1.03%0.98%1.39%2.05%1.27%9.74%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


RISN and HISF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RISN has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to HISF (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISN dropped -21.88% vs HISF's -3.86%.

On 1-year performance, RISN leads with 15.61% vs 5.74% for HISF. On fees, RISN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, HISF has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RISN has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RISN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for HISF.

HISF has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 1.03% for RISN.

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for RISN and 0.87% for HISF.

HISF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RISN and HISF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer