PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIO vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 29.64% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 21.75%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.


RIO

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
29.64%
6M
42.09%
1Y
80.02%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
21.75%

XLU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
2.66%
6M
3.35%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
29.64%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and XLU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.26

The correlation between RIO and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (10 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIOXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.13

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

1.12

+4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.21

2.47

+17.74

RIO vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIOXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

0.71

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.53

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.47

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.40

-0.07

Drawdowns

RIO vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-51.98%

-36.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-9.18%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-17.26%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-25.26%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-36.07%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.92%

-8.18%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-10.22%

-13.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

4.16%

-0.19%

Volatility

RIO vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.60%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

5.60%

+5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.90%

11.70%

+12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.93%

14.64%

+14.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.23%

17.34%

+11.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.63%

19.27%

+11.36%

Dividends

RIO vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than XLU's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.98%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.73%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and XLU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (11.37%) compared to XLU (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs XLU's -51.98%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer