PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. MDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO vs. MDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Medtronic plc (MDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly higher than MDT's -15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed MDT with an annualized return of 22.54%, while MDT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


RIO

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.97%
YTD
35.32%
6M
43.14%
1Y
89.03%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
22.54%

MDT

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.24%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-18.44%
1Y
-6.49%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-5.47%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
35.32%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.83%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and MDT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1990

0.21

The correlation between RIO and MDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO:

$172.61B

MDT:

$103.31B

EPS

RIO:

$13.11

MDT:

$3.58

PE Ratio

RIO:

8.03

MDT:

22.38

PS Ratio

RIO:

1.55

MDT:

2.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO:

$111.41B

MDT:

$35.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO:

$31.10B

MDT:

$5.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO:

$40.42B

MDT:

$7.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOMDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.96

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.89

-0.23

+6.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.91

-0.56

+22.47

RIO vs. MDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the MDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and MDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIO vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than MDT's maximum drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and MDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-57.63%

-31.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-28.90%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-28.90%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-45.10%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-45.10%

+7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-31.23%

+25.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.76%

-16.55%

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

11.52%

-7.43%

Volatility

RIO vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to Medtronic plc (MDT) at 9.32%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

9.32%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.27%

16.28%

+7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.32%

21.07%

+8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.30%

21.93%

+7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.65%

23.25%

+7.40%

Dividends

RIO vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than MDT's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.54%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.82%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

RIO vs. MDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Medtronic plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B202120222023202420252026
30.65B
9.02B
(RIO) Total Revenue
(MDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and MDT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to MDT (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs MDT's -57.63%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and MDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer