RIO.L vs. KRP
RIO.L (Rio Tinto PLC) and KRP (Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP) are both stocks. RIO.L operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while KRP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, RIO.L returned 13.51%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for KRP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIO.L vs. KRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RIO.L is traded in GBp, while KRP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KRP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIO.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly lower than KRP's 34.99% return.
RIO.L
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 26.74%
- 6M
- 30.12%
- 1Y
- 87.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
KRP
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 34.99%
- 6M
- 38.73%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- —
RIO.L vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO.L Rio Tinto PLC | 26.74% | 34.77% | -13.38% | 6.96% | 32.01% | 0.26% | 30.37% | 28.27% | 0.31% | 18.09% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 34.99% | -24.40% | 22.53% | -4.27% | 53.21% | 91.77% | -50.44% | 33.35% | -3.53% | -12.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIO.L and KRP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.15 |
The correlation between RIO.L and KRP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RIO.L:
£121.15B
KRP:
$1.76B
RIO.L:
$13.15
KRP:
$0.60
RIO.L:
7.44
KRP:
24.59
RIO.L:
1.44
KRP:
5.71
RIO.L:
2.58
KRP:
3.37
RIO.L:
$111.44B
KRP:
$309.11M
RIO.L:
$45.93B
KRP:
$319.28M
RIO.L:
$44.33B
KRP:
$177.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIO.L vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank
RIO.L
KRP
RIO.L vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIO.L | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.12 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.25 | 0.70 | +5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.43 | 1.73 | +21.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIO.L vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIO.L drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than KRP's maximum drawdown of -78.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO.L and KRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIO.L | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.07% | -78.45% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -20.65% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.61% | -30.64% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -32.91% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | -3.90% | -7.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.53% | -23.06% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 8.34% | -4.60% |
Volatility
RIO.L vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison
Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) at 6.91%. This indicates that RIO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIO.L | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 6.91% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.82% | 18.09% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.91% | 24.54% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 28.62% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.43% | 40.75% | -12.32% |
Dividends
RIO.L vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison
RIO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than KRP's 10.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 10.22% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIO.L Rio Tinto PLC | 4.06% | 4.75% | 7.16% | 5.53% | 9.90% | 14.14% | 5.43% | 5.76% | 6.07% | 4.66% | 3.42% | 7.42% |
Financials
RIO.L vs. KRP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto PLC and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIO.L vs. KRP - Profitability Comparison
RIO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a gross profit of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
KRP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 59.66M and revenue of 65.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.
RIO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported an operating income of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
KRP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported an operating income of 15.80M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
RIO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a net income of 5.46B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
KRP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a net income of 3.97M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIO.L and KRP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RIO.L and KRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer