RINT vs. SCHF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. RINT is actively managed, while SCHF is passively managed. Over the past year, RINT returned 21.90% vs 32.67% for SCHF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RINT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.

Performance

RINT vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.56% return.

RINT

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 8.39%
• 6M: 11.05%
• 1Y: 21.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHF

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 15.56%
• 6M: 18.62%
• 1Y: 32.67%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINT vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	8.39%	16.65%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	15.56%	18.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RINT and SCHF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.96

The correlation between RINT and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RINT vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 42
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 44

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINT vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RINT	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.09	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.87	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	2.86	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.94	11.11	-4.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RINT vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINT	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.09	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.72	0.44	+1.28

Drawdowns

RINT vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and SCHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINT	SCHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-34.87%	+22.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-11.48%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.86%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-7.38%	+5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	2.95%	+0.21%

Volatility

RINT vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is 4.31%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that RINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINT	SCHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	5.66%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.36%	13.34%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	15.74%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.64%	16.39%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	17.18%	-2.54%

RINT vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINT vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.82%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	2.96%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINT and SCHF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, RINT and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RINT or SCHF?

SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to RINT (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

Which ETF is better, RINT or SCHF?

On 1-year performance, SCHF leads with 32.67% vs 21.90% for RINT. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RINT or SCHF?

Over the 1-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 32.67% return vs 21.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINT or SCHF?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINT or SCHF?

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

What is the main difference between RINT and SCHF?

They also come from different issuers: Russell and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.06% for SCHF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.