RINT vs. BKIE
RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. RINT is actively managed, while BKIE is passively managed. Over the past year, RINT returned 21.90% vs 22.58% for BKIE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RINT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
RINT vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RINT having a 8.39% return and BKIE slightly higher at 8.46%.
RINT
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
RINT vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF | 8.39% | 16.65% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.46% | 17.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINT and BKIE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025 | 0.96 |
The correlation between RINT and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINT vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
RINT
BKIE
RINT vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.99 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 7.68 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.56 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 0.92 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
RINT vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -28.19% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -11.41% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -1.33% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -4.98% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.95% | +0.21% |
Volatility
RINT vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINT | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.42% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.36% | 12.17% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 14.58% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 16.12% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 16.34% | -1.70% |
RINT vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINT vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BKIE's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% |
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF | 0.82% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, RINT and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BKIE has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to RINT (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 1-year performance, BKIE leads with 22.58% vs 21.90% for RINT. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, RINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 22.58% return vs 21.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.
They also come from different issuers: Russell and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.04% for BKIE.
BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINT and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer