FGDL vs. BR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while BR (Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, FGDL returned 27.62%/yr vs -1.20%/yr for BR. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

FGDL vs. BR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDL achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly higher than BR's -30.17% return.

FGDL

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -1.37%
• 6M: -16.26%
• YTD: -6.20%
• 1Y: 20.79%
• 3Y*: 27.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.68%

BR

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 6.95%
• 6M: -20.93%
• YTD: -30.17%
• 1Y: -35.78%
• 3Y*: -1.20%
• 5Y*: -0.63%
• 10Y*: 10.40%
• ALL TIME*: 13.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	$138.80M	$141.62M	$211.35M
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	$1.02M	$929.90K	$1.28M

FGDL vs. BR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	-6.20%	64.15%	27.31%	12.92%	0.72%
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	-30.17%	0.27%	11.65%	56.23%	-5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDL and BR is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022	0.05

The correlation between FGDL and BR shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGDL vs. BR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGDL

FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 30
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BR

BR Risk / Return Rank: 7
BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BR Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BR Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGDL vs. BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGDL	BR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	-1.34	+2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	-1.98	+3.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.77	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	-0.76	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	-1.24	+3.07

FGDL vs. BR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the BR Sharpe Ratio of -1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDL and BR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGDL vs. BR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDL drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum BR drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDL and BR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGDL	BR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.58%	-59.02%	+32.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.58%	-48.21%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.58%	-48.21%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.05%	-41.13%	+16.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-9.28%	+4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.33%	29.52%	-17.19%

Volatility

FGDL vs. BR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) is 6.14%, while Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that FGDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGDL	BR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	9.95%	-3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.68%	23.62%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.25%	27.27%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.40%	23.94%	-4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.40%	24.11%	-4.71%

Dividends

FGDL vs. BR - Dividend Comparison

FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.	2.53%	1.66%	1.49%	1.48%	2.04%	1.33%	1.46%	1.66%	1.77%	1.53%	1.90%	2.12%
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGDL and BR in my portfolio?

FGDL and BR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGDL or BR?

BR has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to FGDL (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDL dropped -26.58% vs BR's -59.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.