RINFX vs. ANWPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RINFX (American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class R-5) and ANWPX (American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - RINFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by American Funds, while ANWPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, RINFX returned 7.39%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for ANWPX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RINFX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for ANWPX.

Performance

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class R-5 (RINFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINFX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than ANWPX's 6.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RINFX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 7.39%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.

RINFX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 4.01%
• 6M: 4.56%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: 11.59%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 7.39%

ANWPX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 18.40%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RINFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class R-5	4.01%	13.58%	9.59%	9.78%	-8.45%	13.23%	5.99%	16.18%	-3.33%	11.86%
ANWPX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A	6.76%	21.33%	16.76%	24.63%	-25.92%	17.64%	33.42%	30.10%	-5.99%	28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RINFX and ANWPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.85

The correlation between RINFX and ANWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RINFX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINFX

RINFX Risk / Return Rank: 51
RINFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RINFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RINFX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RINFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RINFX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

ANWPX

ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 27
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class R-5 (RINFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RINFX	ANWPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.49	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	2.14	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.27	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	1.73	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	7.31	+2.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINFX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINFX	ANWPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.49	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.50	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.75	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.67	+0.23

Drawdowns

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINFX drawdown since its inception was -21.20%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINFX and ANWPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINFX	ANWPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.20%	-52.34%	+31.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.87%	-11.48%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.75%	-17.93%	+10.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.16%	-34.45%	+19.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.20%	-34.45%	+13.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.58%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-8.11%	+5.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.35%	2.72%	-1.37%

Volatility

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class R-5 (RINFX) is 1.87%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that RINFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINFX	ANWPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.87%	3.98%	-2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.87%	10.77%	-5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	13.39%	-7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.56%	17.20%	-9.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.36%	17.83%	-9.47%

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINFX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINFX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

RINFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than ANWPX's 6.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANWPX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A	6.16%	6.57%	5.13%	5.36%	4.16%	7.01%	4.13%	3.67%	7.59%	5.50%	3.86%	6.14%
RINFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class R-5	4.86%	5.05%	5.45%	5.05%	5.15%	4.69%	5.82%	4.82%	5.13%	3.56%	3.83%	4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINFX and ANWPX in my portfolio?

RINFX and ANWPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINFX or ANWPX?

ANWPX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to RINFX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINFX dropped -21.20% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RINFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.