RINF vs. TLTW
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW).
RINF and TLTW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RINF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. TLTW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD). It was launched on Jun 18, 2022. Both RINF and TLTW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RINF vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RINF vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | -0.49% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | -0.39% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 1.39% | 11.36% | -2.18% | 0.73% | -11.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.39% return.
RINF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.22%
TLTW
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 0.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RINF vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
TLTW
RINF vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RINF | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.75 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 1.05 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.28 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | 3.35 | -2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RINF | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.75 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.03 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and TLTW is -0.49. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RINF vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than TLTW's 13.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.81% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 13.67% | 14.82% | 14.47% | 19.59% | 8.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RINF vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than TLTW's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and TLTW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -18.61% | -24.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -5.80% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -3.02% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -8.49% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 2.21% | -0.81% |
Volatility
RINF vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is 1.23%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that RINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 3.46% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 5.80% | -3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.44% | 8.88% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 11.55% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 11.55% | +1.11% |