RINF vs. IBDU
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and IBDU (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while IBDU is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RINF returned 5.19%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for IBDU. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBDU.
Performance
RINF vs. IBDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly higher than IBDU's 0.54% return.
RINF
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 1.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
IBDU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
RINF vs. IBDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 1.38% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | 8.77% | 16.20% | 1.98% | 5.34% |
IBDU iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF | 0.54% | 7.59% | 3.62% | 8.67% | -13.04% | -2.05% | 10.38% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and IBDU is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | -0.29 |
The correlation between RINF and IBDU shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (3 years) to -0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. IBDU — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
IBDU
RINF vs. IBDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RINF | IBDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.76 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 10.13 | -9.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RINF vs. IBDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than IBDU's maximum drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and IBDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | IBDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -19.44% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -1.59% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -4.14% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | -19.44% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.54% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -5.37% | -11.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 0.43% | +0.95% |
Volatility
RINF vs. IBDU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) at 0.65%. This indicates that RINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | IBDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 0.65% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 1.56% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 2.22% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 5.71% | +7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 7.29% | +5.26% |
RINF vs. IBDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDU's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINF vs. IBDU - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than IBDU's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDU iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF | 4.66% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.21% | 3.34% | 2.29% | 2.42% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.74% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and IBDU have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RINF has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to IBDU (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs IBDU's -19.44%.
On 5-year performance, RINF leads with 5.19% vs 1.11% for IBDU. On fees, IBDU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDU has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RINF has performed better with a 5.19% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
IBDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.74% for RINF.
RINF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IBDU is Corporate Bonds. RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while IBDU tracks Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.10% for IBDU.
IBDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and IBDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer