PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDU vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDU vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDU achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.47% return.


IBDU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.10%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.03%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
1.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDU vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
0.67%7.59%3.62%8.67%-13.04%-2.05%10.38%2.22%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDU and AGG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.87

The correlation between IBDU and AGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDU vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDU
IBDU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IBDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDU vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBDUAGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.38

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

2.06

+1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.81

+1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.47

5.61

+5.86

IBDU vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDU Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDU and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDUAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.38

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.04

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

IBDU vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDU drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDU and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDUAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-18.43%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-2.76%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

-6.11%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-17.82%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-1.93%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-2.71%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.89%

-0.47%

Volatility

IBDU vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) is 0.58%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that IBDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDUAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

1.32%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

2.76%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

3.85%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

6.09%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.32%

5.41%

+1.91%

IBDU vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDU vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

IBDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
4.66%4.67%4.75%4.21%3.34%2.29%2.42%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDU and AGG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGG has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to IBDU (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDU dropped -19.44% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 5-year performance, IBDU leads with 1.41% vs 0.23% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBDU has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IBDU has performed better with a 1.41% return vs 0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDU.

IBDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.98% for AGG.

IBDU is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. IBDU tracks Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDU and 0.03% for AGG.

IBDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDU and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer