RINF vs. CLIP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP).
RINF and CLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RINF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. CLIP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2023. Both RINF and CLIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RINF vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RINF vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | -0.74% | 1.64% | 9.79% | -0.29% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.86% | 4.23% | 5.26% | 2.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 0.86% return.
RINF
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 4.19%
CLIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RINF vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
CLIP
RINF vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RINF | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 13.56 | -13.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 40.64 | -40.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 11.02 | -9.99 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 74.34 | -73.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 595.00 | -594.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RINF | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 13.56 | -13.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 10.60 | -10.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and CLIP is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RINF vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than CLIP's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.82% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.03% | 4.14% | 5.11% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RINF vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and CLIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -0.08% | -43.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -0.05% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | 0.00% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | 0.00% | -16.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 0.01% | +1.43% |
Volatility
RINF vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.05%. This indicates that RINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 0.05% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 0.15% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.45% | 0.30% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 0.45% | +12.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 0.45% | +12.21% |